Ask Rita: What to Do When the FMLA Replacement Is A Better Performer
What happens if an employee who is filling in for another employee out on FMLA turns out to be better in the position? What are our options?
What do we say to an employee ready to return from FMLA when their job was taken over by someone who does it better?
Dear Rita,
One of our employees was in a fairly serious, non-work-related car accident about 2 months ago. They had some serious injuries but thankfully has recovered well and is almost ready to come back to work. They were also eligible to take FMLA and will be coming back when their 12 weeks of FMLA leave expires.
Because the position the employee had was critical to our operations and the services we provide, we had to move another employee into that position and we were careful to let the replacement know that the assignment was temporary because the employee would be coming back to the position when the FMLA is over.
One problem. The employee on FMLA was having challenges doing the job and was going to be spoken to before they had the accident. It was not long after the replacement started that it was very clear that they were head and shoulders better at doing this job than the employee on FMLA. We know we have obligations to the employee on FMLA to put them back into the original position but doing so might negatively affect the important work this position requires.
Any idea what we can do to do what FMLA allows yet make sure our business is not compromised?
Sincerely,
Confused
Dear Confused,
You can take some comfort that this is a far from unique situation and one which innumerable employers face every day. The employer has some flexibility, but that flexibility is limited.
Let’s start with the FMLA basics.
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was enacted by Congress in 1993 to require employers of 50 or more employees to provide eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave of absence for, among other reasons, the employee’s own serious health condition, or the serious health condition of certain designated family members. Eligible employees are those who have worked for the employer for 12 months and have worked 1250 hours in the 12 months prior to the start of the leave.
While the leave is unpaid, FMLA is a “protected” leave, meaning that when the leave has been exhausted, and the employee is ready to return to work, the employee “must be restored to the same job or to an equivalent job”. It is important to note that the FMLA regulations say that the employee is not guaranteed the actual job held prior to the leave.
Thus, if the employee is going to be provided a different position on return from their leave, the employer must be very careful to ensure the new position is “equivalent” to the position they took the leave from.
According to FMLA guidance, an “equivalent job” means a job that is virtually identical to the original job in terms of pay, benefits, and other employment terms and conditions (including shift and location). The Department of Labor’s FAQs on FMLA are helpful in analyzing what an equivalent job is:
- Offers the same shift or general work schedule, and be at a geographically proximate worksite (i.e., one that does not involve a significant increase in commuting time or distance);
- Involves the same or substantially similar duties, responsibilities, and status;
- Includes the same general level of skill, effort, responsibility and authority;
- Offers identical pay, including equivalent premium pay, overtime and bonus opportunities, profit-sharing, or other payments, and any unconditional pay increases that occurred during FMLA leave; and
- Offers identical benefits (such as life insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, sick leave, vacation, educational benefits, pensions, etc.).
More more information visit: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fmla/faq
While there is risk in not restoring the returning employee, you do have some latitude to reassign the returning employee to a different, but “equivalent” position. If you choose to reassign on the employee’s return, a careful analysis of the alternative position to determine whether it is “equivalent” using the factors suggested by the Department of Labor, is essential to avoid a claim of retaliation or violation of FMLA.
If there is any question or uncertainly that the contemplated alternative position is not “equivalent” using these factors, the employee should be restored to the same position they took the leave from. When the employee returns, you can address any performance issues and need for improvements that were observed prior to the employee going out on leave. As you would expect, you should also exercise caution in approaching the subject with the returning employee since they might perceive this action as retaliation for taking the leave — -also a prohibited action under the FMLA.
In summary, FMLA can present a minefield of risk and navigating that minefield should be guided by careful attention to the employee’s rights and providing the rights and protections to the employee — -even if someone can do the job better!
You might also like:
- Drive Your Nonprofit’s Mission by Investing in Your People
- Supporting Caregiver Employees in the Nonprofit Sector
- Increase Safety for Your Nonprofit’s Team
- Ask Rita in HR: Should Murphy’s Law Be a Consideration in Making HR Decisions?
- Moving Beyond Performance: Making DEI Actionable
You made it to the end! Please share this article!
Let’s help other nonprofit leaders succeed! Consider sharing this article with your friends and colleagues via email or social media.
About the Author
Mike Bishop is a member of the State Bar of California and has been admitted to practice in a number of federal district courts in both California and Ohio. During his legal career, Mike worked for 32 years with a Sacramento law firm, where he focused on employment litigation in both state and federal courts. During that time, he defended employers in litigation.
In 2016, he began his work as an Employment Risk Manager for the Nonprofits Insurance Alliance, assisting nonprofits in evaluating employment risks. Mike lives in Lakewood, Ohio, and is a graduate of the University of California, Davis, with a bachelor’s degree in political science, and a 1982 graduate of the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law.
Articles on Blue Avocado do not provide legal representation or legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice or legal counsel. Blue Avocado provides space for the nonprofit sector to express new ideas. The opinions and views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect or imply the opinions or views of Blue Avocado, its publisher, or affiliated organizations. Blue Avocado, its publisher, and affiliated organizations are not liable for website visitors’ use of the content on Blue Avocado nor for visitors’ decisions about using the Blue Avocado website.
2 thoughts on “Ask Rita: What to Do When the FMLA Replacement Is A Better Performer”
Leave a Reply
Related Posts
I think the returnee must be ‘leveled with” including sharing the “talk” that had been planned before the accident occurred. (Date of the planned talk should be the key shared fact.) Perhaps there’s some way to offer a substitute position actually that is more challenging than the original job. Perhaps the new employee can demonstrate ways to improve the job in a more efficient manner or be assigned to a higher-skilled job.
I am a retired staff engineer who was a design engineering supervisor prior to spending a year in the hospital to partially recover from a serious neurological disease (Guillian Barre’ Syndrome) that required using a wheelchair (that I still do 30 years later!). My excellent bosses knew I could no longer function as a mobile person, so changed my job to one requiring less travel. I loved learning new responsibilities and came to work for nine more years before retiring with 41 years for Caterpillar and earning my pay to design a very useful product. I could go on about post-retirement actions to help others with disabilities.