What Should We Do About an Employee’s Outrageous Blog?
An employee posts unflattering comments about your nonprofit workplace. What can you do? Here are some ideas.
Article Highlights:
What are your options when workplace gossip finds its way online?
Dear Rita,
An employee googled our nonprofit’s name and came across a coworker’s blog. The blog contains some outrageous material, including some unflattering comments about working at our organization.
What can our nonprofit do?
— Blog-Burned
Dear Blog-Burned:
It seems like just 10 years ago most workplace gossip was confined to clandestine meetings in the break room. Once uttered, it vanished like the last donut. Not so today. Now the blogosphere captures those rants and raves for all to read in perpetuity.
The best way to deal with a problem like this is to prevent or discourage it by establishing a blogging policy for all employees.The second best course of action may be to ignore the blog. But if there is some detriment to your agency, ask the employee to remove the offending material — after confirming the blog is not legally protected speech.
If the content is discriminatory or harassing, treat the blog as workplace conduct and initiate appropriate remedial action. A New Jersey court held that Continental Airlines had a duty to stop the harassment of a female pilot contained on a coworker’s personal blog. Lastly, determine if any discipline is appropriate given the content of the speech and the employee’s response to your request to take the content off the blog.
To evaluate what can be done to stop the unflattering blogging you must consider the content of the speech and the law of your state.
Employee blogging could be deemed protected speech under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or whistleblower laws. The NLRA allows employees to discuss the terms and conditions of employment with the purpose of engaging in collective action to change them. Whistleblower laws in some states protect employees from retaliation if they report illegal or unethical behavior to government officials or agency management.
Additionally, some states have laws prohibiting an employer from disciplining an employee for participating in “legal recreational activities outside of work hours” unless that activity creates “a material conflict of interest related to the employer’s business interest.”
While many of these state laws have yet to be used to protect the right to blog, they could be applied here. To determine what law is applicable in your state look to your local chamber of commerce or nonprofit association for state employment laws concerning “privacy” or “off duty conduct.”
You might also like:
- Nonprofit Photo Contest
- Link Arms to Elevate Your Nonprofit’s Impact
- Drive Your Nonprofit’s Mission by Investing in Your People
- Supporting Caregiver Employees in the Nonprofit Sector
- Increase Safety for Your Nonprofit’s Team
You made it to the end! Please share this article!
Let’s help other nonprofit leaders succeed! Consider sharing this article with your friends and colleagues via email or social media.
About the Author
Blue Avocado is an online magazine fueled by a monthly newsletter designed to provide practical, tactical tips and tools to nonprofit leaders. A small but mighty team of committed social sector leaders produces the publication, enlisting content from a wide range of practitioners, funders, and experts.
Articles on Blue Avocado do not provide legal representation or legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice or legal counsel. Blue Avocado provides space for the nonprofit sector to express new ideas. The opinions and views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect or imply the opinions or views of Blue Avocado, its publisher, or affiliated organizations. Blue Avocado, its publisher, and affiliated organizations are not liable for website visitors’ use of the content on Blue Avocado nor for visitors’ decisions about using the Blue Avocado website.
I suggest that somebody should point out to the disgruntled employee that her/his statements on the blog will likely hurt her/him more than it hurts the organization. For example, if that person were to look for a job someplace else, that critical blog could be found by the prospective employer. Who is going to want to hire a whiney, critcal, complainer?A few years ago I interviewed a man to hire from another department in the same company. He seemed to have the job prerequisites and good references. His performance appraisals from his current job were "pretty good" (not stellar, but above average) However, his personnel file contained a letter written by him as a comment to his last performance appraisal. His letter attacked his boss for favoritism and he attacked his peers for incompetence and laziness. If he had not written that letter I probably would have hired him, but I certainly didn’t want somebody with that attitude on my team.
It seems that the emphasis, rather than being placed on the medium of communication, should be placed on the content of the message and the reasons for it. Evaluating the employee’s performance, discussing his goals, and reaching an understanding about the source of the frustration are all much better avenues to pursue than trying to figure out whether you’re squashing someone’s right to express themselves. In the best-case scenario, you can reach accord with your staffer, and he might take the offending posts down all on his own, or better still, blog about how much his organization and manager care about his well-being.
You passed up someone who was perfectly qualified and had good references and already knew the organization?!
I would suggest that that’s just stupid and typical of how bad managers miss out on securing good talent and creating a high performance environment.
To penalize an employee for having the courage to express grievances and concerns not only fails to fix the problem, it legitimizes their complaint and deprives your organization of an environment where people can trust that their concerns are taken seriously and not used as a cudgel against them…a perfect recipe for low morale and high turnover.
People don’t come to work because they want to be unhappy or disgruntled. Generally, people BECOME disgruntled because they’ve been treated unfairly or perceive that they’ve been treated unfairly.
I would submit that the wrong question is being asked.
Don’t ask what you can do about someone who’s blogging negatively about you. If you get someone to the point that they want to take the energy to blog about what a terrible employer you were, odds are you probably did something to deserve it. "First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you will see clearly enough to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."
I have to say I agree with ANONYMOUS. First of all, you state that you should treat it as workplace conduct and act accordingly. That could be grounds for a cause of action for the employee who is NOT at work, and is either AT HOME or on PERSONAL time.
Obviously, if the disgruntled employee is blogging about the company, and the facts are true, how can you complain as the employer?
If the facts are false, that is a different story. Just the facts, ma’am. Just the facts.
Our organization has an agreement that is signed by each new employee. The document acknowledges the employee’s rights to conduct their life outside work as they see fit, but also the employee’s agreement that they will not engage in activity that would put the organization in a bad light or be detrimental to the organization in any way and further states that employees agree to conduct themselves in a professional manner when attending any functions on behalf of the organization. While I think a blogging policy is a good idea, I would be reluctant to tell a person they can’t blog, which some corporations have tried. In addition to the above excellent comments, I would want to evaluate the validity of the comments made on the blog. Perhaps this unfortunate way of expressing dissatisfaction is masking the existence of a real problem. Evaluating the employee’s performance, discussing his goals, and reaching an understanding about the source of the frustration are all much better avenues to pursue than trying to figure out whether you’re squashing someone’s right to express themselves.
team building consultants
It’s just a matter of time until all the major businesses will include a special clause in the employment agreement, a clause called "No trashing the workplace in your personal blog."
Anonymous has approached the subject in the most proactive and innovative manner. This is the way we must approach all our dealings with employees, volunteers and each other.
I think people should be able to express their feelings (on paper, blog or whatever). If what they’re saying is not true they can always be sued and stuff but if what they’re saying is true well why not let them tell the truth ? because it bothers ?
I tend to agree. The first concern when an employee is trashing their company or organization in their blog should be why there is something trash-able in the first place. Sure, agreements not to make the company look bad can be a good idea, but ultimately the onus is on the organization to make sure employees want to shout from the rooftops how great their employers are!
The document recognizes the rights of the employee to make your life outside of work as they see fit, but also the employee’s agreement that they will not engage in activity that would put the organization in a bad light or be detrimental to the organization in any way and states that employees agree to act in a professional manner when attending any functions on behalf of the organization andy
Thank you so very much for this very insightful article!
The document recognizes the rights of the employee to make your life outside of work as they see fit, but also the employee’s agreement that they will not engage in activity that would put the organization in a bad light or be detrimental to the organization in any way and states that employees agree to act in a professional manner when attending any functions on behalf of the organization andy
Thank you so very much for this very insightful article!
Great blog and good questions! Thank you very much for this useful article and the comments.
Good points, May be we can’t do anything, but I think we can try to make a good relationship with the employees and we can do a lot of things… From: California labor law posters
Good points, May be we can’t do anything, but I think we can try to make a good relationship with the employees and we can do a lot of things… From: California labor law posters
To be clear, the last three paragraphs of my answer were not specifically about your remote work policy, but were about your attitude toward policies and employee insubordination in general. If a specific policy is truly needed to protect your business, that s one thing, but if you view reasonable and professional feedback about what workplace policies aren t working as insubordination, you have a much bigger problem.
Love your resources! I appreciate your details and depth writing style and all your eye cache points was so awesome.
Love your resources! I appreciate your details and depth writing style and all your eye cache points was so awesome.