Practical Guide to How Nonprofits Can Create Equity in Organizations and Community

Article Highlights:

• JDEI work and processes are usually only the first step in achieving racial equity.
• Beyond JDEI
• Systems Analysis
• “Race and…”
• Proactive, not Reactive

JDEI work and processes are usually only the first step in achieving racial equity.

In May 2020, when Black Lives Matter protests ignited by the murder of George Floyd erupted across the country, many organizations started becoming more aware of the need to challenge racism and to encourage racial equity in their own spaces. At Race Forward, this increased awareness became evident when inquiries about our racial equity training more than doubled.

Over the last few months, I’ve spoken to hundreds of organizations that have made a commitment to racial justice and now want to go through Justice, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (JDEI) work and processes. We must recognize that this is usually only the first step in achieving racial equity.

Beyond JDEI

In our many years of working with organizations, we’ve seen how racism persists even when staff are racially diverse or are given a seat at the decision-making table. While diversifying staff and leadership is critical, it doesn’t always ensure racial equity. Even when an organization is filled with well-intentioned people, racism often persists because our systems, policies, and practices continue to be racially inequitable.

We need to move beyond our usual JDEI frame of thinking to truly transform our organizations to become more racially equitable.

In other words, the presence of people of color in our organizations does not automatically lead to racial equity, because racism doesn’t just reside in individuals. It also lives in our systems, institutions, policies, and practices. Racism is not just individual or interpersonal; it is also institutional and structural.

Structural racism refers to racial inequities across institutions, policies, social structures, history, and culture. Though a belief that only individuals need to change, not our systems and institutions, trains us to pay attention only to individual or interpersonal racism, the inequities of structural racism are symptoms of white supremacy, defined by the Meriam-Webster dictionary as “the social, economic, and political systems that collectively enable white people to maintain power over people of other races.” When we look at what’s reported in mainstream news and conversations, rarely do we hear about structural racism and the ways that it permeates our culture, policies, and practices.

It’s important for us to shift our attention towards structural racism so we can come up with viable, long-lasting solutions to systemic racism in our organizations and society. This shift in attention is a critical first step to doing racial justice work.

Systems Analysis

The way to address structural racism across institutions and policies is to do a systems analysis, which requires us to analyze the problem holistically to identify not just the racial disparities themselves, but the roots of those disparities.

When we’ve identified the roots of a problem, an array of solutions is then revealed. Because structural racism is an amalgam of racist systems, policies, institutions, and practices, it takes an analysis at the systems level to bring to light solutions that are equally systemic.

A systems analysis of the disparity between the incomes of Black and white staff, for example, could reveal the racial wealth gap, antiblack narratives in popular media, or inequities in the education system to be at the root of this disparity.

Once these roots are revealed, it becomes clear that our solutions must also address these roots if we’re to prevent this disparity from persisting or recurring.

There are many ways to do a systems analysis, but in general this type of analysis asks the following questions:

• What are the racial inequities? Who’s harmed and who benefits?
• What institutions and unfair policies or practices are involved?
• What are popular ideas, myths, or norms that reinforce the problem?
• How did things get this way?
• What are the key causes, contributing factors, or compounding dynamics?
• What are the cumulative impacts?
• What solutions and strategies could eliminate the inequities?

When we ask questions like these, we begin to look at the roots of racial disparities and to come up with systemic solutions.

“Race and…”

Another approach to addressing systemic racism is to use a “race and…” approach: race and gender, race and immigrant status, and so on. A “race and” approach allows us to address race explicitly, but not exclusively. 

Or, in other words, we address race prominently and intersectionally, such that race is a complementary, rather than a competing, frame, as for example with environmental justice and racial justice, or reproductive justice and racial justice. Systems of oppression are inevitably connected to one other.

We cannot address racism without also addressing sexism, the exploitative features of capitalism, and other ills. An intersectional approach expands our solutions and allows us to address the disparities experienced by individuals that follow from the multiple identities and experiences they carry with them.

When addressing income disparities in our organizations, for example, we have to address not only race, but issues of race and gender, race and class, and so on. This way, we can advance policies and practices that are truly just.

A “race and” analysis will tell us that while there are disparities in the wages of men and women, there are further disparities between black women and white men. The policies and strategies we create and implement will need to account for these different levels of income inequities, which usually impact queer and femme staff of color the most.

Proactive, not Reactive

Finally, we recommend that organizations take a proactive stance when it comes to racial equity: creating systems, policies, and practices that are racially equitable before problems surface. Often organizations wait until harm or inequity is brought to their attention before diving into racial equity work.

Reactionary solutions take more time and effort, and greater resources, especially when the harm we’re trying to address demoralizes people, which can lead also to the exodus of staff of color from the organization.

Proactive racial justice policies and systems prevent burnout and harm while creating racially equitable organizations where staff of color, along with everyone else, thrive and succeed.

You might also like:

• Nonprofit Photo Contest
• Link Arms to Elevate Your Nonprofit’s Impact
• Can Nonprofits Look to the Past to Build the Future?
• How Lessons Learned From Fighting Food Insecurity Can Help Your Nonprofit
• The Big Chill: Why Nonprofits Should Care about Affirmative Action

 

You made it to the end! Please share this article!

Let’s help other nonprofit leaders succeed! Consider sharing this article with your friends and colleagues via email or social media.