New Thinking and Talking About Volunteers
With volunteers of all ages coming, it’s even more urgent that we change the way we talk — and think — about volunteers.
Article Highlights:
It’s urgent that we change the way we talk — and think — about volunteers.
“Men don’t volunteer as much as women do,” or so says conventional wisdom. But Susan Ellis counters: “Men volunteer a lot; they’re just not called volunteers. They’re called coaches and firemen!”
With new waves of stimulus package volunteers and retirement-age volunteers coming down the road, it’s even more urgent that we change the way we talk — and think — about volunteers.
Old language (often said in apologetic tone): “We have only a few staff, so we have to rely on volunteers.”
New language: “Because we have so many volunteers, we don’t need more than a few staff.”
Old: “Our volunteers help us [staff] so much!” gushes a nonprofit staffperson.
New: “Volunteers help the patients so much!”
Old: “We have a couple of volunteers who help with the newsletter,” said the director of a nonprofit legal services organization, adding, “Oh yeah! And some pro bono attorneys.”
New: “Our organization is lucky to have pro bono attorneys, pro bono writers, and pro bono graphics and layout staff.”
Old: “We have 25 staff and 175 volunteers,” said a museum director starting a speech.
New: “We have 200 staff, of whom 175 are volunteers and 25 are paid.”
To quote Susan Ellis again: “Paul Revere made his living as a silversmith. But he’s remembered for what he did as a volunteer.”
If you’re a volunteer (messenger, revolutionary, American hero like Paul), share this article with the volunteers and staff you work with.
Let’s change not only the world, but the way we talk about it.
You might also like:
- A Practical Guide to Getting and Keeping Nonprofit Volunteers
- Treasurers of All-Volunteer Organizations: Eight Key Responsibilities
- Volunteering Alone Will Not Save Us
- Up Your Game with Skills-based Volunteering
- Creating a More Robust Volunteer Development Program
You made it to the end! Please share this article!
Let’s help other nonprofit leaders succeed! Consider sharing this article with your friends and colleagues via email or social media.
About the Author
Susan J. Ellis is president of Energize, Inc., an international training, consulting, and publishing firm specializing in volunteerism. Susan has written 12 books on volunteerism and is known as an engaging speaker and thought-provoking writer. She is co-publisher of the international online journal, e-Volunteerism, and dean of faculty for the online volunteer management training program, Everyone Ready. She volunteered (without a court order) to write this article for Blue Avocado.
Articles on Blue Avocado do not provide legal representation or legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice or legal counsel. Blue Avocado provides space for the nonprofit sector to express new ideas. The opinions and views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect or imply the opinions or views of Blue Avocado, its publisher, or affiliated organizations. Blue Avocado, its publisher, and affiliated organizations are not liable for website visitors’ use of the content on Blue Avocado nor for visitors’ decisions about using the Blue Avocado website.
Why on earth is it a contradiction to feel great about the work volunteers do AND to provide a decent salary for paid staff? Seems to me that if we see these two things in opposition, we’re already in big trouble. I do think, however, that nonprofits should invest more time, energy and planning into how to make the most of volunteers so that overworked paid staff aren’t scrambling madly to come up with tasks for volunteers at the last minute. To me, that’s one of the things that makes it hard for paid staff to appreciate volunteers. But I guess that’s another story for another time.
Thanks Jan for offering a great change in perspective.
What you write really resonates – for the past two years, I’ve been recruiting and training volunteers at an organization called Exhale, and we’ve initiated and implemented a “culture shift” around volunteer involvement. Not only do we talk about volunteers in the way that you describe, but we engage them in leadership opportunities and development – they excel personally and professionally as a result, and our organization truly thrives with their contributions. Here’s hoping more orgs move in this direction – I think it benefits everyone.
Agreed – we need new language but replacing “We have only a few staff, so we have to rely on volunteers.” with “Because we have so many volunteers, we don’t need more than a few staff.” is not the right way to phrase it!
One of the unspoken issues paid staffs have – which is why they often sabotage volunteers by treating them poorly – is that they may be replaced by volunteers. This only reinforces that concern. What I would suggest instead is, “We have a fantastic team of paid staff and volunteers who work in partnership to serve our clients; they each bring unique strengths to our mission.” Also – Please pardon my plug, but my book, “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Recruiting and Managing Volunteers” comes out 10/15/09 from Penguin. And yes, several of these issues are addressed! John L. Lipp, President, PAWS (Pets Are Wonderful Support) www.pawssf.org, jlipp@pawssf.org
Agreed – we need new language but replacing “We have only a few staff, so we have to rely on volunteers.” with “Because we have so many volunteers, we don’t need more than a few staff.” is not the right way to phrase it!
One of the unspoken issues paid staffs have – which is why they often sabotage volunteers by treating them poorly – is that they may be replaced by volunteers. This only reinforces that concern. What I would suggest instead is, “We have a fantastic team of paid staff and volunteers who work in partnership to serve our clients; they each bring unique strengths to our mission.” Also – Please pardon my plug, but my book, “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Recruiting and Managing Volunteers” comes out 10/15/09 from Penguin. And yes, several of these issues are addressed! John L. Lipp, President, PAWS (Pets Are Wonderful Support) www.pawssf.org, jlipp@pawssf.org
How would you handle 4,000 volunteers with a paid staff of only four people? Here’s a video interview with the ED of Seattle Works and her viewpoint on volunteers. It’s pretty interesting.
http://www.501videos.com/mmpr/0209/eng_volpr.html
“One of the unspoken issues paid staffs have – which is why they often sabotage volunteers by treating them poorly – is that they may be replaced by volunteers.”
Staff should have clear contractual job descriptions for themselves and clear roles described for volunteers within the organization. A union is a good way to put some teeth into that contract.
Thanks
Visit re imagining service today!